Independent Sector Launches “Envisioning Our Future” Initiative, But is it Inclusive Enough?

Yesterday I was on a press briefing call to learn about Independent Sector‘s new initiative to “reinvent the nonprofit sector.” Envisioning Our Future launches in earnest next week with a conversation among 75 pre-selected nonprofit sector leaders during a three-day “StrategyLab,” to be held July 28-30 in Colorado Springs, where they will deliberate on the future of the nonprofit community. Independent Sector describes this new effort as a combination of research and innovative engagement methodologies to:

  • Deepen our collective understanding of the trends that will affect the nonprofit sector;
  • Generate new insights and ideas about how nonprofits and foundations can best address the challenges and opportunities that lay ahead; and
  • Develop a cohort of leaders involved in thinking critically about this work for the sake of their own organizations and the sector at large.

Along with Independent Sector’s president Diana Aviv, this initiative is being led by Stephen Heintz, president of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and Marguerite W. Kondracke from America’s Promise.

My question on the call was really the “so what” factor. What will be the outcome of these structured conversations? Stephen admitted that since this is an experimental process, it’s “hard to know what’s going to happen.” Since this is a new effort for them to elicit creative thinking outside the box, Independent Sector has contracted with Architects of Group Genius to facilitate the conversation and help them report out about the process. The 75 participants were instructed to do pre-reading – broad books about how to think differently about the world – such as The Age of the Unthinkable by Joshua Ramo, The Idea that is America by Anne-Marie Slaughter, and Megacommunities by Mark Gerencser et. al. Diana said that the idea was to involve as many people as possible in this conversation to generate new thinking, “not the same old, same old leaders.” Diana assured us that the group of 75 meeting in Colorado to talk about reinventing the sector involved a diverse set of people from different generations and different areas of the sector. The 75 leaders come to the table with significant influence as well-respected members in their field. Diana indicated that the group comes to table with “80% of the knowledge in hand” while the other 20% will come from learning from each other. Independent Sector is hoping there will be consensus on what the nonprofit sector needs to do to reinvent itself in the next 10 years.

My main concern about this initiative is that what could be a very groundbreaking effort will instead be an elite conversation involving a very small cross-section of nonprofit leaders (75 leaders representing almost 2 million nonprofits in America?) with young people, grassroots leaders and people of color largely left out of the equation. The participant roster, however, is fortunately not a carbon copy of the Nonprofit Times’ Power & Influence Top 50 list of majority white, Baby Boomer leaders. Generation Y leaders involved include Ben Rattray of Change.org and Maya Enista of Mobilize.org. People of color on the list include Barbara Arwine of Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Carol Thompson Cole of Venture Philanthropy Partners, John E. Echohawk of Native American Rights Fund, Karen K. Narasaki of Asian American Justice Center, Ralph Smith at Annie E. Casey Foundation, and Luz A. Vega-Marquis of Marguerite Casey Foundation. It appears that about 30 out of the 75 participants are leaders of color, which is a pretty good percentage of racial diversity compared to your typical gathering. Ben Rattray and Maya Enista, however, are the only leaders under 30 on the list. And for a country that is teeming with millions of Generation Y leaders (the second largest generation behind Baby Boomers), this is a huge oversight on the part of a group that seeks to examine trends in the nonprofit sector and develop a plan for the future. How can you have a conversation about the future of anything without the people who will be moving that future forward? Most of the leaders involved are over 40, and while they have incredible experience and knowledge to draw upon, they do not represent the future in the way that younger people do just by virtue of being their successors.

Overall, Independent Sector’s Envisioning our Future initiative seems like a good thing for the sector, and the published documents that result from these conversations could be helpful to nonprofit leaders in navigating this new environment. They also plan to launch an online conversation this fall to engage the broad nonprofit community in this important discussion, as well as host conversations at their Annual Conference in November.

I will be following this effort closely as it unfolds this fall, but my sense is that it is just not inclusive enough (as it stands right now) to be as useful as it could be for our broad nonprofit sector, including the grassroots, community-based groups. As it stands, the only way that other nonprofit leaders can participate in this conversation is to pay hundreds of bucks to attend Independent Sector’s Annual Conference or wait for the online component to launch. And having only 2 Generation Y leaders involved in a conversation about the future is just not sufficent for such an expansive topic.

Godspeed to Ben and Maya in representing thousands of Generation Y nonprofit leaders in this effort. We need our voices to be heard.



Did you enjoy this post? Subscribe and automatically receive new ones!
Email:
 Subscribe in a reader

  • Share/Bookmark

Related Posts

 
  • Bill Huddleston
    Rosetta,
    Here's the open letter I sent to the attendees at the Colorado Springs meeting. Commenting software doesn't allow the diagrams to be displayed. Email me and I'll send you the .pdf version.

    Regards,
    Bill


    Open Letter to Colorado Spring’s Nonprofit Summit
    July 2009

    Dear Attendees at the Colorado Springs Non-profit Summit:

    The conveners have asked for input, so here are my top seven issues for your consideration, discussion and action:

    1. Non-profits have done a spectacularly lousy job of explaining themselves to the American public.

    Modern societies need three components to function: government, businesses, and non-profits. Non-profits are the glue that holds society together, and while in the USA we have a market economy, our society is bigger than the economy. Non-profits are inherently different than businesses. Governments are inherently different than businesses. Here is a diagram showing the fundamental difference between businesses and non-profits. It is astounding how many non-profit leaders (and political leaders) don’t do a better job of communicating to the American public about the value of all three components of society, all of which are critical.

    Business Organization Non-profit Organization


    The fundamental difference is that in the business example, the provider of the funds is also the direct recipient of the benefits of goods and/or services provided, e.g. customers. On its face, the diagram on the right is more complex than the one on the left, and this is what non-profit leaders have done a poor job of communicating to the American public.

    Warren Buffet’s Gift to the Entire Non-profit Sector

    When Warren Buffet pledged his $30 billion gift to the Gates Foundation, he also gave a gift to every non-profit in America, if they are smart enough to recognize it. Here is the world’s best known financial genius of the market based economy, saying that the non-profit sector is too complex for him to figure out the best use of his money – so he’s going to give it to his good friends Bill & Melinda Gates, so that they and the Gates Foundation professional staff can make sure the money does the most good! This is terrific, both for the Gates Foundation and for the entire non-profit sector, because it makes the case in way that no one else could, that the non-profit world is not simple, and it’s not easy to make sure that any donor’s money is used in the best way possible. I have yet to see any non-profit leader use this stunning example as an illustration of the fact that the non-profit world is complex, and it takes, brains, talent, dedication and plain hard work to for a non-profit to be successful.


    2. The question: “Are there too many non-profits?” is a weak question, and answering it only produces thousands of pages of reports and no real change.

    A better question is: “Have we solved all the problems that need solving?”

    Until the answer to that question is yes, then the answer to “Are there too many profits” is: “ No, we don’t have enough of the right non-profits!”

    This is similar to the question: Are there enough restaurants?

    The answer to that depends where you live, and what you want to eat. In some places the answer is yes, some places no.

    Even if you decide the answer is “Yes, there are too many non-profits” there is no mechanism to force a change, and just like the restaurant example, if a particular non-profit does not get enough traffic (e.g. donors and patrons), it will fail, regardless of how good the chef was.


    3. Scalabity is a false idol.

    Recognize the fact that we live in a complex world, and some non-profits need to be big in order to accomplish their mission. Other non-profits do not need to be big in order to be successful, and in fact, would fail if they were a different size.

    Here’s one example, in Annandale, Virginia there is an award winning non-profit pre-school, which has been part of the community for 40 years. It is located in a church where it uses the Sunday school classrooms during the week (it is a secular school, completely separate from the church). This pre-school has an enrollment of about fifty 2-5 year olds, which with a little fluctuation is the size it will always be – the church is not going to build and additional wing, and after 3 years, the current students graduate. This school, as long as it is in existence, will have between 40 and 60 students, and it provides a great, award winning benefit to the community. The leaders there don’t spend one minute thinking “How can we scale up?” nor should they.



    4. Stop the whining! There are way too many non-profit leaders and professionals saying ‘We don’t have a seat at the government table - why not, don’t they know we’re crucial?”

    More than 150 years ago, Frederick Douglass got it right when he said:

    “The struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, and it may be both moral and physical, but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.”

    In terms of gaining a rightful place at the governmental table, Robert Egger’s V3 campaign is one that tackles this issue head on. (www.V3campaign.org – Voice, Value, Votes). He realizes that the only thing that political leaders understand is power, and until the non-profit sector learns how to work together and exercise its collective influence (which is considerable) it will never get a place at the table. So stop whining, and start acting – see the V3 website on how to do this.


    5. Don’t forget the power of ordinary individuals achieving extraordinary results.

    The non-profit sector suffers from the same “star CEO mentality” that has captured the business world, and the articles that get promoted are about the star CEOs, or the Top 50 Donors, etc. As many of you know, my expertise is workplace giving, especially the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC). While the big donors are getting the attention, more than 1 million Federal public servants collectively donate millions of dollars each year, ($1 billion over the past five) and this money is unrestricted, reliable and predictable. Of this, more than half are never thanked for their contribution and the volunteers that do the actual solicitations for thousands of non-profits are almost never thanked.

    One non-profit that does thank both their anonymous donors and the CFC campaign volunteers is Martha’s Table in Washington, D.C. If you want to see how to do this right, take a look at the workplace giving section of their website.

    Ordinary people working together achieving extraordinary results is what America has always been about, and it’s time to realize that the myth of the “rugged individualist” is just that – a myth. Celebrate the actions of people working together to make a difference, even if they don’t get the headlines.

    6. Trends in the non-profit sector - Baby Boomers aren’t going to go away.

    The baby boom generation cohort has redefined our society at every age, from elementary school to Woodstock to today. They may change jobs, change careers, go to some mixture of independent consulting and “regular job” but they are not going to retire at 65 to go sit on a rocking chair and do nothing. Get used to having a very diverse workforce, including age diversity.

    Whether for career changers or emerging leaders, workplace giving can provide ideal “practice fields” for developing one’s leadership skills, which is just one of its benefits beyond just raising money.


    7. The Philanthropist TV show should be supported.

    This is an incredible opportunity and benefit to the entire non-profit sector. THERE IS A PRIME TIME TV SHOW DEALING WITH NON-PROFIT ISSUES! This is great! Don’t miss the forest for the trees, and I don’t care whether or not you think “it’s not an accurate portrayal of the difficulties that non-profit professionals face.” It is entertainment and it will generate interest and conversation about non-profits! Believe me; you don’t want to be hosting the panel 3 years from now “What could non-profits have done better to have kept The Philanthropist from being canceled.”

    Here’s what you can do now, and have your supporters do the same:
    Contact Angela Bromstad, President of NBC Primetime Entertainment, and tell her that you’re a fan and want the show picked up for next season. Then e-mail Tom Fontana, co-creator and writer at TomFontana@gmail.com and tell him that you’ve sent the message of support to NBC.




    Regards,

    Bill Huddleston

    Huddleston Consulting Group
    BillHuddleston@verizon.net
    www.cfcfundraising.com
    703-560-1825
    Blog: www.cfctreasures.wordpress.com
  • @Neel - Thanks for stopping by! I will be following your Twitter feed - hope you have time to share your thoughts from Colorado! I would also like to invite you to write a guest blog about your experience/learnings if you'd be interested.
  • @Megan - Thanks for taking the time to share the additional background info! As you can see, lots of folks have thoughts about this new project and will be excited to participate in your online conversations. I'm glad to have this space to share and engage others as the project unfolds.
  • Hey, I'm an under-40 person of color at a $1M nonprofit who is headed to the StrategyLab. I realize I'm not a national name, but hopefully that's part of the point. I'm looking forward to participating, and will try to tweet (@new_org) and maybe blog some evening updates - no communication devices allowed during day! I am optimistic that good things will come out of this. More to come!
  • Megan Hoot
    Some of you may know me from my work with NGen, I work for IS and I am a Gen Y-er. I am writing from Colorado now as one of the core team members planning, designing and implementing this week’s StrategyLab and have been involved with this process from its onset. To get this initiative off to a strong (and manageable!) start, this week’s StrategyLab involves a relatively small cross section of diverse leaders. Careful consideration was given to creating a dynamic mix of initial participants -- we wanted to be sure that the leaders involved came from different backgrounds, parts of the country, and types of organizations. We have heard from many people who wished to be included, so I just wanted to let the readership know of several opportunities they have to get involved in this Envisioning Our Future initiative.

    Soon an extensive and open online conversation designed to include all nonprofit staffers and stakeholders will launch. I will personally send the link to this webpage to you, Rosetta, and will be actively reaching out to other blogs and platforms where young leaders and grassroots nonprofits can easily access this information and contribute- so stay tuned for more soon!

    Content from the online conversation will be fed into a series of FutureLabs at the IS Annual Conference in November. FutureLabs are mini-StrategyLabs that focus on specific issues, such as technology and communications, demographic shifts, or new sustainability models for the sector. I am hoping for – and working on recruiting - strong Gen Y representation at the conference and the Labs, including our new American Express NGen Fellows program for nonprofit leaders under 40, which was described in one of Rosetta’s previous blog posts.

    There will be lots going on in the next 6 months, and I’d be happy to talk with anyone who might be interested in learning more, or I can post again with more- please email me at meganh@independentsector with questions or comments! Thanks Rosetta for drawing attention to this exciting new project and I look forward to hearing from the readership online!
  • Elisa
    Somehow I doubt they have any representatives from any of the 93%+ nonprofits with budgets under a million dollars, let alone the vast majority of that group that have budgets under $25,000.

    I agree with Heather and with your concerns Rosetta: this is yet another attempt to 'reinvent' something that IS and their members are largely not even a part of: the small, grassroots, community-based nonprofit sector.
  • Rosetta:

    I'm not too thrilled about the Envisioning our Future Initiative either. Also, did you notice the majority are CEO's? There are so many amazing thought leaders in the sector that are not CEO's. Also, the University representatives were from Harvard & Stanford and did not represent the top thought leaders in nonprofit academia.

    With that said, I was not surprised to see the demographics of this group, given the demographics of those that support and are paying members of IS. IS has very few grassroots and younger members :(

    You should check out the Nonprofit Next Initiative by LaPiana and Associates which is a similar initiative discussing the future of nonprofits, but in a more inclusive manner.

    http://lapiana.org/Research-Publications/Initiatives/Nonprofit-Next.html
  • Bill Huddleston
    Rosetta,
    I absolutely share the concerns you expressed in your post. What I'm working on right now is a "open letter" to the attendees that I will both send to Ms. Aviv, as well as post it on my blog.

    Is there a published list yet of who the 75 invitees are?

    Thanks,
    Bill

    Bill Huddleston
    www.cfcfundraising.com
  • Let's definitely grab lunch or coffee when I get back, I'd love to de-brief with you. Thanks for writing this great post.
blog comments powered by Disqus