5 Ways to “Emerge” as a Nonprofit Leader

Hildy Gottlieb’s latest post has got me to thinking more about the so-called generational leadership gap in nonprofit organizations. She and I agree that there is not really a “gap” in leadership. What we really have is an ongoing disconnect around the myth that young people aren’t yet “ready” to take the reigns from current leaders .  . . when it’s clear that we absolutely are. This inability for many older leaders to pass the torch is partly what causes young people to become disenchanted with nonprofit work and often underperform in their current roles. Many young nonprofit professionals are waiting until they get the title of “Director” to lead. They are waiting until their older colleagues deem them “ready” to lead instead of emerging as leaders in the here and now. But what we have to understand is that this behavior doesn’t benefit our organizations nor the communities we seek to serve. What we have to understand is that we need as many young people as possible to emerge as nonprofit leaders, even if they don’t have a title. The future of the nonprofit sector depends on it.

Leadership theorist Peter Northouse outlines the fundamental difference between assigned and emergent leadership in his book Leadership Theory and Practice.  He asserts that assigned leadership is based on being hired into a particular position in an organization: “Executive Director/CEO” or “Development Director” or “Senior Vice President” etc. Assigned leadership is based on having a certain title in an organization that automatically deems you a leader. Northouse points out, however, that assigned leaders are not always necessarily perceive as the “real leader” of the organization. For instance, they may be the big boss, but the only reason their employees obey them is because they fear getting fired.

In contrast, emergent leadership is exhibited when an individual is perceived to have influence in a group or organization, regardless of their title. How does this happen?

In his 1974 book Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process, B. Aubrey Fisher proposed that successful leader emergence happens over time as a result of several positive communications behaviors. He said that one could emerge as a leader without being assigned a title if one exhibited the following behaviors:

Be verbally involved

This means, speak up! The more you insert your voice into the decisionmaking process of your organization, the more visible you become to everyone. Ask questions, even if you think they’re dumb. Don’t just be a head nodder, speak up and verbalize why you agree with a certain decision. Likewise, if you disagree with a decision that’s being made, say so. And explain why. People may not agree with you, but they will respect you for speaking your mind. Many times, the other people around the table are thinking the same thing you are. If you get the opportunity to lead a meeting, do it! And if you have rotating staff meetings, volunteer to run one of them.

Be informed

Stay abreast of what’s happening in your nonprofit and your field. Being knowledgeable can give you an edge in your work as well as earn you a reputation as an “expert” within your organization. Read all of your own organization’s newsletters and annual reports. Examine your own 990s on Guidestar. Using social media as your news feed can definitely help you stay informed, as Elisa commented on this blog recently:

Twitter has definitely helped my career! It has helped me build my knowledge base on nonprofit best practices, resources and technology which has allowed me to contribute intelligently to conversations within the office and provide evidence to back up my statements. In the last couple of places I’ve worked, I’ve also been one of the first people to find out about late breaking news or important new resources that have just come out relevant to our work. Both of these things have helped me build my ‘clout’ within the office and made me a more indispensable employee.

Seek others’ opinions

Many times, the opinions of young people can be discounted because of our age. On some, “what does this kid think she knows?” It’s not right, but it still happens. It may be fair to call this reverse ageism, but it won’t help to go around accusing people in your organization of being ageist. No one likes to be called names, even if the shoe fits. Instead, consider asking older colleagues what they think of your ideas before you present them. That way you’ll be able to tweak them if they bring up an angle you haven’t thought about, and they can support you when it’s time to possibly implement your idea within the organization.

Initiate new ideas

You know you have great ideas. I know you have great ideas. But does anyone else? It doesn’t help your organization for you to sit still and silent when you have a way to improve the way your nonprofit provides services or help save your nonprofit money. I once worked at an organization where we were paying a ton for health insurance for all our employees because no one had the time to do the research to see if there were any comparable, but less expensive plans out there. If someone had taken that on as a stretch assignment, it would have been a great idea and extremely helpful to our bottom line.

Be firm but not rigid

We learn about a lot of great theories in grad school. We read a lot of management books. We know how to use a lot of great social media tools. We may think we know a thing or two. And we do. But we also have to remember that our ideas are not the only ideas. They may not even be the best ideas. If you present an idea and nobody else is into it, don’t write them all off as ageist losers, but continue to work with your colleagues to come up with something that makes sense to everyone. It pays to know your stuff, but you can’t be so rigid that it’s “your way or the highway.”

What are some ways that you’ve been able to lead within your organization (or in your community) without having a title? How else would you interpret Fisher’s five suggested behaviors?

Image credit: Lynn’s Little Bit of Trivia



Did you enjoy this post? Subscribe and automatically receive new ones!
Email:
 Subscribe in a reader

  • Share/Bookmark

Related Posts

 
  • I agree that it is important for individuals to take initiative to become leaders. AND, it’s equally important for non-profit organizations to create an environment that allows that to happen. This is the “sweet spot” organization I’ve written a little bit about in the past at http://tinyurl.com/yg8nvg6

    I am helping to actively foster a “sweet spot” organization where I work. As we do so, employees will become more engaged, work will become more exciting, innovations will come with more frequency and oomph, and our organization will be able to accomplish infinitely more than what any one of us could accomplish alone. It’s the power of an organizational community and a collaborative environment. But, it doesn’t just “happen.” It needs wise guidance to strike a balance between formal and informal organizational processes. And when the balance is there, good things happen for organizations.

    Cultivating tomorrow’s leadership in nonprofits needs to be a priority today, and the “sweet spot” is one way to promote that.
  • Thank you for writing a wonderful piece on emerging leaders and the trend of non-profit organizations to overlook their value. As a young leader myself, I often feel as though my opions are dismissed because they differ from the "old guard" - I'm considered a rebel, a troublemaker - not a leader. I'm constantly amazed how some organizations fear embracing a progressive (read "different") attitude, especially when that individual is a volunteer leader and freely gives of their time. My work product is second to none yet my "free-thinking" and willingness to challenge the stagnant thoughts/ideas has resulted in a virtual excommunication. Embrace young leadership for if you don't, you'll be left with no leaders in the very near furture.
  • Great post. I agree with Neel. DO GREAT WORK but also HAVE GREAT IDEAS.

    Being young doesn't always imply that the ideas are fresh and new. In addition people aspiring to have influence or be noticed in a work setting is neither extraordinary nor rare. I would encourage everyone regardless their age to make sure that in the final analysis, it's all about the idea. Some of the best companies were started by unwilling leaders & CEOs who were really just trying to bring an idea into being. The leadership was really a byproduct of the need to protect and nurture their concept as they saw fit. From this we should also be mindful that the most innovative and best ideas aren't always readily appreciated nor accepted by team peers, company peers or market peers, as none of these peers are necessarily peers where foresight, vision and capability are concerned.

    Thus we see that great ideas also require Patience. I'd also say wherever you work and whatever your goals, make an effort to identify like minds and like visionaries if you are indeed that. It will make your journey so much easier.
  • Good stuff, Rosetta. I can't help but wonder whether there's a really important baseline assumption that got lost in this list, namely: DO GREAT WORK. Maybe it's implied, or goes without saying? Or maybe it's not considered a behavior per se?

    I often notice the topic of great work being skirted over in discussions of emerging leadership, and yet that's definitely a core consideration for management when they're weighing the potential of up-and-coming staff. To build off your comments above, I also think that a reputation for pursuing and achieving great work does lead to influence among work peers and supervisors. I'm pretty sure that my own path to "young CEO" was paved in part by my near-obsession with producing great results no matter what my role was.

    A lot of the behaviors described above rest on the foundation of achieving excellence, and it would serve young leaders well to seek honest opinions on how their work is perceived.
  • Hi Rosetta-

    TY for continuing to provide concrete examples of how "emerging leaders" can be intentional in expressing their leadership. One of the concepts that I try to explain in my leadership development work is the concept that there is leadership with formal authority ( those w/ the title and traditional authority) and those with informal authority ( no title but have leadership over a project or a team). The idea of these two terms is explored in " leadership without easy answers). Almost everyone ( especially in NPs) has the opportunity to lead with informal authority and should view their opportunities to do so with a chance to shine.

    I agree with Hildy Gottlieb about the shared leadership model that needs to occur but I fear that it is too scary for those who currently hold the leadership to loosen their grip. Makes me impatient but still I think it is our jobs to push them and push on.

    Bests,
    Ericka
  • Again, great insights Rosetta. Makes me think of the Google special by CBS news the other night. They interviewed a woman in her young 30s who was Google's eigth employee and is now a VP leading a lot of their innovative work and branding. One of the things she offered as advice is to do things that you aren't yet ready to do.

    Reading your post, this is made more clear to me because when challenged, trusted and encouraged, people are capable of amazing feats--no matter if they are young or old.

    But, regarding the age thing, it's not talked about as much, but there is a higher wall to climb for those younger. I have a friend who took off the year he graduated school and was offered a manager position overseeing 40 some employees with a six-figure budget. When they learned of his grad date, they still hired him because he is a very capable and well-qualified. However, he said that he used to put the year on his resume and it was a different story. He said the whole interview took a different tone.
blog comments powered by Disqus