There is No Such Thing as a Diverse Candidate


A new article
from the Nonprofit Professionals Advisory Group reminds us to be careful how we use language in the business of nonprofit management. Words matter. And if you participate in hiring or recruiting staff, volunteers or board members for your organization, you NEED to read this.

From Rhetoric to Practice: Recruiting Strategies to Make Diversity More Meaningful in your Organization

One thing that stuck out for me in the article is that, as search consultants themselves, the authors take a practical view of diversity (not just a moral one). A big takeaway comes when they point out the all-important point that nonprofit hiring managers (and even search committees) often miss.

Ready?

There is no such thing as a diverse candidate. 

As the article clarifies:

It is common to hear non-profit executives and human resources personnel refer to “diverse hires,” candidates with “diverse backgrounds,” and the like. The implication is that the person in question – because of his or her gender, race, ethnicity, age, experience, or some other factor – embodies diversity; she or he is diverse. However, individuals are not diverse; groups are diverse. To use an analogy, we can assemble apples, oranges, pears and plums to compose a diverse bowl of fruit, but no single piece of fruit is “diverse” in itself. Diversity is possible, and possibly meaningful, only in the context of the group. Using this framework, it becomes clear that there is no such thing as a “diverse candidate.”

Again, there is no such thing as a diverse candidate. 

You might wanna put this on a t-shirt. Or just chant it over and over at the beginning of your hiring team meetings with a stick of incense burning in the middle of the table. Whatever works.

So, if nonprofits aren’t supposed to be looking for “diverse candidates” or “diverse hires,” what should they be seeking instead?

. . . in the hiring context, the intent must be to identify candidates whose attributes, experiences and perspectives complement and enhance the strengths, needs, values and composition of the work group in ways that will advance the organization’s mission and objectives. It is also important to be honest and explicit about what would NOT be a good fit for a team. Some backgrounds and, especially, belief systems, can challenge the organizational culture in counter-productive ways at certain stages of an organization?s evolution.

Read the rest here.

The authors also outline some key action steps to take if you’re in the midst of hiring or recruiting for a new position right now. It’s good stuff. Print it out and give it to your HR director.

Further reading:

Diversity is the Wrong Word

This morning, I moderated a panel called “Rising Through the Ranks: Race & Gender in Nonprofit Leadership.” The discussion was a joint event between the Nonprofit Roundtable and YNPNdc geared toward emerging leaders in philanthropy and nonprofits.

The conversation opened with Kelly Reid from the National MultiCultural Institute sharing some of the statistics in the Urban Institute’s recent report,  Measuring Racial-Ethnic Diversity in the Baltimore-Washington Region’s Nonprofit Sector. We were joined by a racially and gender diverse panel, including:

Each panelist shared a story about how their leadership experiences in the nonprofit sector have been affected by race and/or gender. It was an amazing discussion and I wish you had been there.

One Really Important Thing that stuck out for me during the conversation was this:

Diversity is very often the wrong word to use when we’re talking about efforts to bring in more people of color or LGBT or men or women into our organizations. We have to get increasingly more specific about what we mean when we say diversity, because we all think something different in our minds when the term is used.

In my case, what I’m usually talking about on my blog is racial justice.

The Applied Research Center defines racial justice this way:

We define racial justice as the proactive reinforcement of policies, practices, attitudes and actions that produce equitable power, opportunities, treatment, impacts and outcomes for all.

I’m talking about inclusion and equality and I’m talking about power. Which is far more complex and involved than diversity. It goes beyond “diversity workshops” and “sensitivity training” and reaches into sector reform, advocacy and policy change.

What many of us do goes way beyond diversity as a blanket concept. But in nonprofit circles, diversity seems to be a much more accessible word for the conversation.

Or is it?

Weekend Reading: Professional Development Tips, Social Media Tasks for Interns and the Best Tweet Ever

  • Sad that I missed this week’s #ynpchat about professional development, but my girl Allison Jones sums up the conversation pretty nicely, including a discussion about the utility of advanced degrees and where to find opportunities.
  • Did you miss my last radio show? I talked to two passionate nonprofit leaders about that crazy new Florida law that’s basically spells disaster for diversity in philanthropy.
  • This weekend, two civil rights groups – the National Council of La Raza and the NAACP – are holding important meetings to talk about issues facing people of color, including the economy. At the same time. In different parts of the country. The logical part of me wonders if their efforts wouldn’t be more powerful if done together. Black and brown, together we stand?
  • Should nonprofit professionals be expected to make a financial donation to their own employerBrigid Slipka says yes.
  • Um, wow. This observation on volunteerism from Do Something just might be the best.tweet.ever.
  • Is Generation Y headed for a social media hangover? I’m gonna go with no.
  • In the meantime, here are 10 meaningful social media tasks for your summer intern. Or any intern for that matter.

Here’s What Foundations Think About the New Florida Law Affecting Diversity in Philanthropy

I had so many questions after hearing about this new legislation in Florida that I requested comment from several organizations regarding their position on advocacy efforts aimed at curtailing how much state and local governments can do to regulate foundations and their diversity practices.

First I asked some of the foundations who are members of the Florida Philanthropy Network, which is obviously in support of  the new legislation:

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

“Our membership in the Florida Philanthropy Network does not constitute an endorsement of their activities on this legislation.”

“The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation believes that diversity and inclusion strengthen the charitable sector’s ability to address social inequities.

Within the foundation, we actively monitor the global diversity of our workforce and we have joined several affinity groups to increase targeted recruitment efforts and expand networking opportunities for current employees. Attracting, supporting, and developing a diverse, global workforce is critical to our impact.

The foundation pays membership dues and provides general operating support to a variety of national charitable sector associations. We also are members of regional grantmaker associations, such as the Florida Philanthropy Network, in states where we have significant programmatic activity.

We were not aware that the Florida Philanthropy Network was advocating for this legislation, and we were never asked to sign on to a letter of support or endorsement of any kind. Our membership in the Florida Philanthropy Network does not constitute an endorsement of their activities on this legislation.”

Jessie Ball duPont Fund

“The Jessie Ball duPont Fund is deeply committed to diversity and inclusiveness.”

From Jessie Ball duPont Fund President Sherry P. Magill:

“The Jessie Ball duPont Fund is deeply committed to diversity and inclusiveness, as evidenced by our grantmaking and our practices within our organization.  For the record, we were not aware of the Florida estate-tax-fix bill prior to its being signed by the governor.”

Then, I asked some of the top infrastructure organizations serving nonprofits and philanthropy. (I’d love to tell you what Independent Sector thinks, but they never got back to me.)

Council on Foundations

“We believe that voluntary leadership prevents legislative mandates.”

“The Council on Foundations has always encouraged voluntary leadership and proactive steps to achieve greater diversity and inclusion as well as transparency and accountability in our field. We believe this stand is right, and we believe that voluntary leadership prevents legislative mandates. Nothing about our commitment or strategy has changed.”

Foundation Center

“Greater transparency is the best defense of philanthropic freedom.”

“The Foundation Center does not take any formal stances on policy matters regarding the operation of foundations. But as a knowledge resource for the field, we believe that more information is better than less, and that greater transparency is the best defense of philanthropic freedom. By providing data to groups ranging from the Philanthropic Collaborative to the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy and conducting research with foundations and regional associations, we are committed to helping philanthropy meet the challenges and opportunities of diversity.”

In reading between the lines, it sounds like these four groups are pretty much opposed to the new Florida law. Too bad they didn’t use their voices to speak up to let the bill’s supporters know before it was passed.

P.S. Join me on Monday, June 28 for a live discussion with Aaron Dorfman, Executive Director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy, who agrees with me that the new Florida legislation is a major setback for philanthropy. Al Pina, Chair of the Florida Minority Community Reinvestment Coalition, will also be joining us.

The Decline of Leadership Development for Nonprofit Professionals of Color?

AGM Diversity Fellowship Program

Yes, it’s 2010. And no, diversity is not dead.

Businesses like PriceWaterhouseCoopers understand that “diversity and inclusion is essential for business success,” especially when it comes to cultivating and supporting their talent. I and many of my colleagues often wish that more nonprofit groups would share this same priority in our work.

So of course, I was really sad to see that two longstanding leadership development programs for emerging foundation leaders of color are going away — at least temporarily. The Associated Grant Makers Diversity Fellowship and the ABFE (Association of Black Foundation Executives) Connecting Leaders Fellowship Program list both similar and different reasons for ending or halting their leadership development program for leaders of color.

Read the rest of my post on the Chronicle of Philanthropy here.

P.S. Do you know of any other leadership development efforts geared toward supporting people of color in the nonprofit sector? If so, please share them in the comments! I’d like to cull a list to share with you dear readers at a later date.

Loading...
Sign up for blog updates and get a FREE chapter of my book, How to Become a Nonprofit Rockstar!