The Normative Problem with the Term ‘Next Generation’ Leaders

Picture2

Earlier this year, I profiled four “now generation” leaders to watch because they are, and will be, doing amazing things for social change in the next year.  But the main reason I wanted to coin the term ‘now generation’ is because I think the ‘next generation’ moniker gives young people (and everyone else) the sense that we have to wait for some undetermined time before we can lead. We have to wait until someone hands us the baton. We have to sit on the sidelines until someone passes us the ball. And until then, we’ve got to sit quietly with the other kids and try to catch the crumbs of wisdom and power that fall from the big kid’s table. We’ve got to wait until we get “next.”

If that’s what we mean by ‘next generation’ leaders, I sure don’t want to be one. To be clear, I don’t see anything wrong with the term in and of itself, but rather how it may be being used to reinforce the current distribution of power in the nonprofit sector.

The Normative Problem

In some ways, I see the term ‘next generation’ being used to further the normative problem we have in nonprofits. Harvard professor and scholar Ron Heifetz talks about how “normative issues” in leadership can make it difficult for new leaders to emerge. Basically, the term ‘normative’ means relating to an ideal model or standard for something, i.e. the “norm.” Heifetz says that we have a normative problem when a community believes collectively that leaders have certain characteristics like age, experience, pedigree, etc. And when a community believes that leaders come packaged in a particular way, they are more likely to wait for those types of leaders to come, instead of allowing different kinds of leaders to emerge. By saying ‘next generation’ leaders, I think we may be implying that young people are up “next” when we reach a certain age or level of experience, which is, in effect “the norm” for current leadership.

‘Next Generation’ Leaders are Not That Young

Most characterizations of the ‘next generation’ assume that these leaders are much younger than current leaders. Hence, the waiting “until we get old enough” connotation. But the reality is that young nonprofit leaders who are typically referenced as the ‘next generation’ are not as young as people think. We’re not all college kids anymore. This year, the oldest of Generation Y will be 30 years old. We’re no longer the “baby” in the workplace, we’re managers and directors and CEOs of great organizations. In short, the young professionals I’ve been talking about on this blog for three years have quickly become the ‘now generation.’ But I’m not sure the term ‘next generation’ takes that into account.

Who Decides When ‘Next Generation’ Leaders Become ‘Now Generation’ Leaders?

Having a cadre of bright young leaders in the nonprofit sector is great, but typecasting us as the ‘next generation’can also indicate that we need someone from up on high to deem us “ready” to lead when our time comes. Using the term can make it seem as if young people will lead after all the Baby Boomers are gone, however we all know that’s not gonna happen anytime soon. Baby Boomers are staying in their jobs longer as a result of the economic downturn, and many are taking on “encore careers” as nonprofit leaders. So it’s up to us, the young nonprofit leaders, to redefine who gets to say when we’re ready to lead. It can’t be our bosses, our mentors, or some older and wiser colleague. It is we who must decide for ourselves whether and when we will lead. I’ve heard too many stories of young people who come into the nonprofit sector, do their jobs well, and wait to be promoted or included or at the very least, heard. What I’ve realized in hearing these stories is that if young people wait for approval from their organizations to lead, if we wait for someone to deem us worthy of leadership opportunities, it will never happen. We have to make our own opportunities. Malcolm X once said (my brackets), “Nobody can give you freedom. Nobody can give you equality or justice or anything. If you’re a man [or woman], you take it.” I want to see us take it.

So the new question I think we need to ask ourselves is not what we will do as ‘next generation’ nonprofit leaders, but what we are already doing to lead right now today. How do you answer that question for yourself? Do you consider yourself to be a ‘next generation’ leader?

5 Ways to “Emerge” as a Nonprofit Leader

Hildy Gottlieb’s latest post has got me to thinking more about the so-called generational leadership gap in nonprofit organizations. She and I agree that there is not really a “gap” in leadership. What we really have is an ongoing disconnect around the myth that young people aren’t yet “ready” to take the reigns from current leaders .  . . when it’s clear that we absolutely are. This inability for many older leaders to pass the torch is partly what causes young people to become disenchanted with nonprofit work and often underperform in their current roles. Many young nonprofit professionals are waiting until they get the title of “Director” to lead. They are waiting until their older colleagues deem them “ready” to lead instead of emerging as leaders in the here and now. But what we have to understand is that this behavior doesn’t benefit our organizations nor the communities we seek to serve. What we have to understand is that we need as many young people as possible to emerge as nonprofit leaders, even if they don’t have a title. The future of the nonprofit sector depends on it.

Leadership theorist Peter Northouse outlines the fundamental difference between assigned and emergent leadership in his book Leadership Theory and Practice.  He asserts that assigned leadership is based on being hired into a particular position in an organization: “Executive Director/CEO” or “Development Director” or “Senior Vice President” etc. Assigned leadership is based on having a certain title in an organization that automatically deems you a leader. Northouse points out, however, that assigned leaders are not always necessarily perceive as the “real leader” of the organization. For instance, they may be the big boss, but the only reason their employees obey them is because they fear getting fired.

In contrast, emergent leadership is exhibited when an individual is perceived to have influence in a group or organization, regardless of their title. How does this happen?

In his 1974 book Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process, B. Aubrey Fisher proposed that successful leader emergence happens over time as a result of several positive communications behaviors. He said that one could emerge as a leader without being assigned a title if one exhibited the following behaviors:

Be verbally involved

This means, speak up! The more you insert your voice into the decisionmaking process of your organization, the more visible you become to everyone. Ask questions, even if you think they’re dumb. Don’t just be a head nodder, speak up and verbalize why you agree with a certain decision. Likewise, if you disagree with a decision that’s being made, say so. And explain why. People may not agree with you, but they will respect you for speaking your mind. Many times, the other people around the table are thinking the same thing you are. If you get the opportunity to lead a meeting, do it! And if you have rotating staff meetings, volunteer to run one of them.

Be informed

Stay abreast of what’s happening in your nonprofit and your field. Being knowledgeable can give you an edge in your work as well as earn you a reputation as an “expert” within your organization. Read all of your own organization’s newsletters and annual reports. Examine your own 990s on Guidestar. Using social media as your news feed can definitely help you stay informed, as Elisa commented on this blog recently:

Twitter has definitely helped my career! It has helped me build my knowledge base on nonprofit best practices, resources and technology which has allowed me to contribute intelligently to conversations within the office and provide evidence to back up my statements. In the last couple of places I’ve worked, I’ve also been one of the first people to find out about late breaking news or important new resources that have just come out relevant to our work. Both of these things have helped me build my ‘clout’ within the office and made me a more indispensable employee.

Seek others’ opinions

Many times, the opinions of young people can be discounted because of our age. On some, “what does this kid think she knows?” It’s not right, but it still happens. It may be fair to call this reverse ageism, but it won’t help to go around accusing people in your organization of being ageist. No one likes to be called names, even if the shoe fits. Instead, consider asking older colleagues what they think of your ideas before you present them. That way you’ll be able to tweak them if they bring up an angle you haven’t thought about, and they can support you when it’s time to possibly implement your idea within the organization.

Initiate new ideas

You know you have great ideas. I know you have great ideas. But does anyone else? It doesn’t help your organization for you to sit still and silent when you have a way to improve the way your nonprofit provides services or help save your nonprofit money. I once worked at an organization where we were paying a ton for health insurance for all our employees because no one had the time to do the research to see if there were any comparable, but less expensive plans out there. If someone had taken that on as a stretch assignment, it would have been a great idea and extremely helpful to our bottom line.

Be firm but not rigid

We learn about a lot of great theories in grad school. We read a lot of management books. We know how to use a lot of great social media tools. We may think we know a thing or two. And we do. But we also have to remember that our ideas are not the only ideas. They may not even be the best ideas. If you present an idea and nobody else is into it, don’t write them all off as ageist losers, but continue to work with your colleagues to come up with something that makes sense to everyone. It pays to know your stuff, but you can’t be so rigid that it’s “your way or the highway.”

What are some ways that you’ve been able to lead within your organization (or in your community) without having a title? How else would you interpret Fisher’s five suggested behaviors?

Image credit: Lynn’s Little Bit of Trivia

Four “Now Generation” Leaders to Watch in 2010

I have said many times that the nonprofit world desperately needs next generation leadership (especially in a challenging economy) and in 2010, this rings true more than ever. I’ve exalted the incredible energy and skills of young leaders that possess advanced education, mastery of technology, and a spirit of collaboration, yet I’ve been challenged by the question of whether next generation leaders really want social change or just a cushy nonprofit job with a corner office. And now that we’ve come to meet face to face with a brand new decade, I now have to state the obvious because it’s long overdue: the “next generation” that I’ve been talking about on this blog for almost three years has quickly become the “now generation.”

In 2010, the oldest of Generation Y will be 30 years old. No longer the “baby” in the workplace, our peers, our organizations, and our communities are looking at us with hearts filled with hope to see what we will do, where we will take the crooked places in our world and make them straight. 2010 demands not that young people get “ready to lead” but actually lead. The world is watching to see if we will step up to lead with compassion, innovation and a sense of urgency to fix the myriad of problems we’ve inherited. What I think we’ll see in 2010 is more young people answering that call.

And guess what? For the entire month of January, I will be showcasing a few who already are! Meet four “now generation” leaders you should watch in 2010. They’ll be doing some big things for social change, and they’ve each agreed to talk to me about their leadership journeys during a series of feature interviews on my radio show this month. Read about them here, then tune in this month to hear what they have to say live on the air! I have noted the air date and the link for each their upcoming interviews in parentheses.

ablackmanAndre Blackman (January 6, 12:00-1:00pm EST)

Andre Blackman is an agent of change and innovation within the public health community. He is very passionate about the role of new media, mobile technology and other useful innovations as it relates to health communications and public health in general – resulting in Public Health 2.0.

Andre feels that both public health and new media are focused on the people, so there should be parallels to how they both interact.

Andre’s background has involved work with science and technology organizations, health nonprofits and traditional public relations. He aims to educate and provide strategy for public health focused organizations and projects who want to make use of the new social interactive landscape and innovative opportunities. You can find his thoughts on public health and innovation through his blog, Pulse + Signal and via Twitter.

MBE HeadshotMaya Enista (January 13, 12:00-1:00pm EST)

Maya Enista has been with Mobilize.org since July 2005. She has worked in both the Washington, D.C. and California offices as the Chief Operating Officer. On March 3rd, 2008, Maya became the Chief Executive Officer of Mobilize.org, following the departure of Founder and Executive Director David Smith.

At 26 years old, Maya is a veteran in the public service sector, beginning her non-profit career 8 years ago. Maya has been active in public service since she was an undergraduate at Rutgers University, focusing mainly on voter empowerment and youth civic engagement. She began her career as the East Coast Coordinator for Rock The Vote at age 17, a position in which she registered over 30,000 young people. Through her work with Rock The Vote, Maya was awarded the first ever Rock The Vote “Rockin’ The Street’s” award.

She continued her voter registration work when she accepted the position of National Field Director for the Hip Hop Civic Engagement Project, a project that grew out of the successful National Hip Hop Political Convention in Newark, NJ. Maya organized a 13 state campaign that registered over 300,000 new voters in the “hip hop generation.”

In addition to her work with Mobilize.org, Maya serves on the Advisory Board for CIRCLE, the Working Group for the Civic Health Index of the National Conference on Citizenship, and the Board of Directors for Youth Service California. For her leadership, Maya has been awarded a YouthActionNet Fellowship, the Independent Sector NGEN American Express Fellowship and Utne Reader’s 50 Visionaries Changing Your World Award.

Maya, very proud of her Jersey roots, grew up in Maplewood, New Jersey and attended Rutgers University in New Brunswick, NJ. Her black labs, Hudson and Zin, have grown accustomed to her busy life style and have now lived in 5 states in less than 2 years.

Dwayne MarshallDwayne Marshall (January 20, 12:00-1:00pm EST)

Dwayne Marshall currently serves as the Founder of The Hope Institute. The mission of The Hope Institute is to serve as a catalyst for social justice and civic engagement through youth empowerment, engaged citizenship and leadership development. The Hope Institute is currently developing a public policy training curriculum to educate youth in Georgia on the leading social issues that adversely affect their lives and communities. The goal is to empower Georgia’s youth by providing them with the education and training for them to become citizens that can make a difference in the future direction of their communities and inspire them to potentially pursue careers in public service.

Prior to establishing The Hope Institute, Dwayne served as a Regional Field Director & GOTV Lead for the Obama-Biden Campaign for Change in Georgia during the 2008 presidential election. In this role, Mr. Marshall oversaw the field operations for Fulton County and played a vital role in the largest voter registration drive in Georgia history. As a result of his dedication and involvement with the Campaign for Change, Mr. Marshall was featured in a documentary entitled “Movement of the People” which profiles the Obama- Biden campaign experience in Atlanta, Georgia.

In addition to the Hope Institute, Dwayne is currently involved with other organizations that promote social justice, community empowerment and youth education such as the Jackie Robinson Foundation, Ray of Hope Christian Church – Social Justice Ministry, City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit system, Georgia Stand-Up and the Fulton County Board of Elections – Deputy Registrar Program. Previously, he has been involved with the Brotherhood of Afrocentric Men and the Big Brothers Big Sisters Program as a mentor to young African American male youth.

Dwayne Marshall remains an active commercial real estate representative with Red Rock Global, LLC which
is based in Atlanta, Georgia. He previously held the position of Vice President with the firm. Red Rock
Global is a commercial real estate services firm that maintains a focus on serving clients within the urban
marketplace that desire to revitalize neighborhoods in need of economic development. As a result of his work
in the commercial real estate industry, Dwayne received a leadership award at the first annual Global
Diversity Summit which recognizes minority professionals in the commercial real estate industry.

Dwayne Marshall remains an active commercial real estate representative with Red Rock Global, LLC which is based in Atlanta, Georgia. He previously held the position of Vice President with the firm. Dwayne received a leadership award at the first annual Global Diversity Summit which recognizes minority professionals in the commercial real estate industry. Mr. Marshall is a graduate of the Goizueta Business School at Emory University with a Bachelor of Business Administration (B.B.A.) degree in Organization Management and Marketing. As a result of his activism and service to the community, Dwayne has been featured in TIME Magazine and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Mr. Marshall’s vision is to further develop The Hope Institute in an effort to empower future generations and give a “voice” to all of the citizens of Georgia.

Samuel Isaac Richard (January 27, 12:00-1:00pm)

Samuel Isaac Richard was raised in Phoenix, Arizona, by two public school teachers.  Community service has always been a large part of his life, even before he knew what “community service” was.  His family was always involved in church inadvertently learning what it meant to care for our neighbor.  They traveled the country camping in National Parks during the summer unintentionally learning about responsibly caring for the earth and those dependent upon its resources, and as a Boy Scout he coincidentally learned the foundations of leadership, civic engagement, and group dynamics. Sam got married last year and lives in Downtown Phoenix.

I met Sam at the 2008 Nonprofit Congress after a speech I gave there. He came up to me with this ball of energy he seemed to be carrying around with him in his jacket pocket. We exchanged cards, and I started following his writing on his first blog, Deserted After Dark. Sam is a deep thinker on community issues, who has been shaking up the nonprofit world and is now running for office on the Phoenix City Council. Find out more about Sam by reading my 2009 interview with him here.

7 Things Kwanzaa Can Teach Us About the Future of Nonprofit Leadership

The Official Kwanzaa Website graphicKwanzaa - A Celebration  of Family, Community and Culture by Dr. Maulana Karenga

Kwanzaa is the annual African American celebration that honors the values and principles of African culture. During the week after Christmas (December 26-January, a different principle is celebrated each day. Each of the seven days of Kwanzaa is dedicated to one of the following principles (or Nguzo Saba):

  • Umoja (Unity): To strive for and to maintain unity in the family, community, nation, and race.
  • Kujichagulia (Self-Determination): To define ourselves, name ourselves, create for ourselves, and speak for ourselves.
  • Ujima (Collective Work and Responsibility): To build and maintain our community together and make our brothers’ and sisters’ problems our problems, and to solve them together.
  • Ujamaa (Cooperative Economics): To build and maintain our own stores, shops, and other businesses and to profit from them together.
  • Nia (Purpose): To make our collective vocation the building and developing of our community in order to restore our people to their traditional greatness.
  • Kuumba (Creativity): To do always as much as we can, in the way we can, in order to leave our community more beautiful and beneficial than we inherited it.
  • Imani (Faith): To believe with all our heart in our people, our parents, our teachers, our leaders, and the righteousness and victory of our struggle.

As I read through all these principles, I realized that there were lessons embedded in each one that we could also learn from in the nonprofit sector. In 2010 and beyond, nonprofits will need to exhibit some very different behaviors if our organizations are to succeed and continue to impact the communities we serve. Consider the possibilities if we were to commit ourselves, as a collective to adhere to the following ideas. How much more could we grow and thrive and do more to improve the world?

Umoja (Unity)

Nonprofits have always had a sense of competition with one another for funding. As the economy has worsened for our clients and our organizational budgets, the turf wars have gotten a lot more vicious. The concepts of marketing and fundraising tell us that we have to showcase what’s different about us, what makes us better than that other nonprofit across the street. As a result, we often think of organizations with similar missions as competitors instead of allies. So when opportunities come up for collaboration that will allow us to serve more people and change more lives, sometimes we pass on them or don’t even see them in the first place. Yet, if nonprofits are to be effective into the future, a sense of of unity in the nonprofit sector will become more and more important. Nonprofit CEOs will need to drop their gang colors and begin to trust and confide in one another. Then, and only then will we be able to fully maximize strained resources and take advantage of new opportunities.

Kujichagulia (Self-Determination)

The ongoing debate about the term “nonprofit sector” has raged on for many years, but seems to have come to a head this year with several new monikers being floated: social profits, humanity sector, community benefit organizations, and so on. While none of them are perfect, the concept of redefining ourselves is one we should explore. Even if “nonprofit sector” continues as the norm, it’s up to our organizations to really define what that means – not that we don’t create value (profit), but that we provide the kind of social value that’s essential for communities to survive. In the next decade, nonprofit leaders will need to speak up for ourselves and let the public know what we’re really about, not rely on the media and others to paint an inaccurate picture of us.

Ujima (Collective Work and Responsibility)

Many groups have begun to understand that working together gets your further than working alone, especially in this new environment. Through the V3 Campaign, many nonprofit communities around the country have come together to put pressure on local governments and political leaders to put their money where their mouths are. In North Carolina, Crossroads Charlotte has been a highly successful collaborative effort to transform an entire community. In Maryland, Envision Prince Georges seeks to do the same thing. Because all of our causes – hunger, affordable housing, education – are inevitable connected, no longer will nonprofits be able to operate in silos apart from the larger community and political landscape.

Ujamaa (Cooperative Economics)

More joint fundraising will need to happen in 2010 and beyond. As organized philanthropy shrinks from foundations and corporations, nonprofits will need to think creatively about new funding models and how to leverage resources through bartering and projects like GiveMN.org. There never has been, nor ever will be, enough money to go around. Along with financial cooperation, of course, nonprofits will also need to engage in true collaboration for the most impact. As Margaret McKenna from the Walmart Foundation lamented last month: “We’ve given grants for collaborative work to four organizations, then after we leave, they just split up the money.”

Nia (Purpose)

Nonprofit leaders continue to be overworked and underpaid. It is those that cannot connect back to the true purpose of why they do the work of social change that get burned out and leave the sector. It pains me that most nonprofit management (and even leadership programs) do not create a space in the curriculum for students and executives to reflect on their purpose, the reason they started working in the nonprofit field. Going into the next decade, nonprofit leaders will need to reflect upon their purpose in doing this work and convert that into renewed energy to continue to do it, even as it gets more and more difficult. We will also have to be more compassionate to one another as colleagues and help others become more resilient nonprofit leaders within our organizations.

Kuumba (Creativity)

After decades of what many consider slow progress in creating social change, there is an incredible need for greater creativity in the nonprofit sector to come up with better and more efficient ways of fulfilling our missions. The White House Office of Social Innovation has made the idea of nonprofit innovation much more popular than it has been in recent years. While some nonprofit leaders get excited about new ways to do the work, others hear “risk” and run far in the other direction. The biggest obstacle to implementing new ideas, however, is not that nonprofit leaders don’t have any. In my recent interview with Trabian Shorters, VP at the Knight Foundation, he pointed out that most innovative ideas fall by the wayside as soon as they are met with the slightest resistance. Yet we know that the urgency of our work demands that we overcome our resistance to change and push forward with the kinds of creative ideas that not only change organizations, but entire communities.

Imani (Faith)

Every single nonprofit leader that works on behalf of a cause should have faith that they can make a difference. If you came here just because you needed a job, we don’t need you. Simply working at a nonprofit does not equal social change, so go rest your laurels somewhere else. The nonprofit sector needs leaders that really and truly believe that change can and will happen because of their work. We need leaders that have the kind of burning faith that breeds courage to make the impossible possible. We also need leaders that will challenge the status quo and risk new methods and strategies and innovations to put bold action behind that faith.

What else can Kwanzaa teach us about the future of nonprofit leadership?

In honor of my 27th birthday on December 31, I’m asking all my readers to donate $27 to benefit the Young Nonprofit Professionals Network of Washington DC. Will you give? Your gift would really make a difference for young nonprofit leaders in DC!

When No Means Yes: What Generation Y Leaders Can Learn From Michelle Kwan

Even if you don’t watch a lot of sports, I’m pretty sure you’ve heard of Michelle Kwan. She’s enjoyed a successful career in figure skating, and recently announced her retirement from the sport (my bold emphasis):

The nine-time American figure skating champion announced Friday that she will begin pursuit toward a master’s degree in international affairs this fall rather than train for next February’s Winter Olympics in Vancouver.

There had been speculation that the 29-year old Kwan would return to the ice after a four year layoff in an attempt to win the Olympic gold that has eluded her throughout her storied career. A career in public service took precedence.

Kwan has served as a public diplomacy envoy for the State Department in recent years and hopes that her graduate degree will help her advance in that field. She will begin classes at Tufts University in September.

Michelle Kwan has effectively given up a career as a figure skating champion to go to grad school and be a public servant. Here she was, a successful Generation Y leader in her field, who decided that she had to give up one passion – skating  - in order to pursue her other passion for public diplomacy. She realized that she had to say ‘no’ to figure skating so that she could say ‘yes’ to a career in public service.

Earlier this year, a Washington post article outlined Kwan’s decisionmaking process about the future of her career:

A return by Kwan, 28, would thrill the legions of loyal fans who adored her as she dominated her sport for a decade, winning nine U.S. championships and earning the distinction, in the minds of many, of being the greatest figure skater of all-time. . . But a decision to stay out of the sport would leave Kwan free to pursue graduate school — she said she has applied to a number of programs and is awaiting acceptance letters — while continuing to further her career with the State Department. ”I could train to get in shape to be in the Olympics, or to do a tour perhaps in the future, or it could be just chilling with my two nieces at the rink,” she said. “That’s where I’m at. . . . It’s nice to have all of these options right now, because I am not sure.”

Although her fans will undoubtedly miss her, Michelle Kwan’s decision to leave the world of figure skating offers young nonprofit leaders a few lessons in leadership.

Don’t Limit Yourself
Like most talented, educated Generation Y leaders, Michelle Kwan had a lot of options. But the great thing is that she didn’t limit herself to just being a figure skater. She took the courageous leap into doing something outside of her realm of expertise, something she now has to go back to school for. Sometimes Generation Y leaders can get pigeonholed into doing a job just because we’re good at it. Even though you majored in English and love to write, your organization may be on some, ‘oh, she’s great at managing the budget, let’s make her the finance manager,’ without stopping to think about if it’s really what you want to do. Don’t let someone else tell you where you’re best suited. You may possess many other talents, but you just have to step out on faith to test them out.

Your Goals May Not Match Those of Your Organization
Michelle’s fans will miss her. The sport of figure skating will not be able to benefit from the excitement of what could have been her comeback next year. If Michelle’s main goal was to please her fans, she would be out there on the ice right now. But she chose to focus on a new career path that didn’t mesh with the wants and needs of the sport. Same goes for young nonprofit leaders. You have to know what your priorities are, and they are not always going to mesh perfectly the goals of your nonprofit. They may need you to work late into the evenings, but you want to do yoga after work. So what if your nonprofit is starting a capital campaign? If the pace or the demands of the job don’t fit you, don’t do it.

When One Door Closes, Another Will Open
Even though you may be yearning to go in a slightly different direction with your career, it can be hard to get past the feeling that you’re burning a bridge you can’t ever cross back over. But this is not necessarily the case. If you keep your skills and knowledge of the field updated, you can always go back to what you’re doing now. For instance, even though she is changing careers, Michelle can still serve as a sports commentator for figure skating or tour with other former skating champions. When I made the decision to take a break from school, I felt like I was quitting, with no idea of what to do next. But soon after that, I began to receive emails about opportunities that seemingly weren’t there before. As the old saying goes: “Leap, and the net will appear.” You may not know exactly where you’re going at first, but somehow, sometime, a map will be provided for you.

Is it time for you to say ‘no’ so you can say ‘yes’ to what you really want to do in your life right now?

Loading...
Sign up for blog updates and get a FREE chapter of my book, How to Become a Nonprofit Rockstar!